On February 3, 2025, numerous Latino-owned restaurants and businesses across Chicago closed their doors in solidarity for a protest dubbed the "Day Without Immigrants." This event aimed to highlight the vital contributions of immigrants to the local economy and culture, particularly in the wake of increased federal immigration enforcement actions.
Key Takeaways
- Solidarity Action: Many Latino-owned businesses closed to protest against federal immigration policies.
- Historical Context: This protest echoes a similar movement from 2017, rooted in earlier demonstrations from 2006.
- Community Impact: The closures reflect the fear and uncertainty within immigrant communities due to potential ICE raids.
Background of the Protest
The Day Without Immigrants is a movement that began in 2017, but its roots trace back to a nationwide protest in 2006. This year’s event saw a significant number of businesses in Chicago’s Little Village, a neighborhood known for its vibrant immigrant community, participating in the closure. Signs announcing the closures appeared over the weekend, signaling a united front against the current political climate surrounding immigration.
Voices from the Community
Carlos Covarrubias, owner of Xurro, a popular churro chain, expressed the personal impact of federal immigration policies on his community. Covarrubias stated that the actions of the federal government feel particularly targeted towards Hispanic and other minority communities. He decided to close his businesses to support his employees and the broader immigrant community, emphasizing the importance of their contributions to American culture and economy.
Covarrubias shared on social media that his father emigrated from Mexico in 1970, and without his sacrifices, his business would not exist today. He stated, "By pausing our operations, we want their voices to be heard and advocate for a more inclusive society."
Economic Implications
The protest not only aimed to raise awareness but also had tangible effects on the local economy. Many restaurants that typically rely on deliveries from local vendors faced disruptions. For instance, Francisco Produce, a Mexican-owned supplier, did not make deliveries on the day of the protest, forcing restaurants to reschedule their orders.
Additionally, the threat of tariffs on goods from Mexico loomed over many restaurant owners, raising concerns about the rising costs of ingredients like avocados and heirloom corn. The uncertainty surrounding these economic factors added another layer of complexity to the protest.
The Bigger Picture
Felipe Ospina, a veteran in the restaurant industry, highlighted the essential role immigrants play in the workforce. He noted that many undocumented workers contribute significantly to the economy, paying billions in taxes while facing the constant threat of deportation. Ospina remarked, "They’re the backbone to many, many, many restaurants — they do not harm anyone."
Despite the challenges, there is hope among community members that the current political climate will stabilize, allowing immigrants to live without fear. Ospina expressed optimism that the government would recognize the human element in immigration policy and work towards a more humane approach.
Conclusion
The Day Without Immigrants serves as a powerful reminder of the contributions of immigrant communities to the fabric of American society. As Chicago’s restaurants and businesses closed their doors in solidarity, they not only protested against current policies but also celebrated the rich cultural heritage that immigrants bring to the city. The event underscores the ongoing struggle for immigrant rights and the importance of community solidarity in the face of adversity.
Sources
- Dozens of Chicago Restaurants Close for ‘Day Without Immigrants’, Eater Chicago.